Thursday, February 28, 2013

The Engadget Interview: Microsoft's Greg Sullivan on Windows Phone at MWC 2013

The Engadget Interview Microsoft's Greg Sullivan on Windows Phone at MWC 2013

We caught up with Greg Sullivan -- senior product manager of Windows Phone -- for an early morning chat during Mobile World Congress. He was kind enough to give us an update on the state of Microsoft's mobile OS, which has apparently experienced a four-fold increase in sales since version 8 launched last fall and is taking share away from Android in the UK. We discussed the delightful user experience provided by lower-end Windows Phone 8 handsets like Nokia's Lumia 620 and asked how Microsoft plans to satisfy power users at the higher-end of the spectrum who are still missing critical features such as proper notifications, quick settings and CalDAV / CardDAV support (to name a few). It's clear that the company's aware of these shortcomings and is working to remedy most of them in a future release. We also talked about the ecosystem, what Microsoft is doing to improve app quality, how it meshes with Windows 8 / RT and whether the company is looking to expand its partnership beyond existing device manufacturers. Look for our full video interview after the break.

Filed under: , ,

Comments

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/YRTio5h7erw/

aaron rodgers Joe Webb Fiesta Bowl Jeanie Buss NFL playoff schedule 2013 biggest loser Bronson Pelletier

Marco Rubio sounds a lot like Obama in big foreign-policy speech

Sen. Marco Rubio, seen as being on the Republican presidential short list in 2016, delivered a foreign policy speech Wednesday that included a lot of common ground with President Obama.

By Howard LaFranchi,?Staff writer / February 27, 2013

Israel's President Shimon Peres (r.) shakes hands with Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida during their meeting in Jerusalem last week. Mr. Rubio spoke on foreign policy in Washington Wednesday.

Ronen Zvulun/Reuters

Enlarge

Bullets, though not the weapons firing them, is what Sen. Marco Rubio (R) of Florida says he would advocate providing Syria?s rebels.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

That suggestion, proposed in a Middle East-oriented talk Senator Rubio gave at a Washington think tank Wednesday, was about as far as the rising Republican foreign-policy authority strayed from Obama administration policy as he discussed his views on issues ranging from Iran to Israel and the Palestinians.

Rubio recently published an article entitled ?Refusal to Lead? in Foreign Policy magazine, in which he criticized President Obama for neglecting America?s leadership role in international issues from Syria to North Korea?s nuclear challenge to the global promotion of democracy and human rights.

But in his talk at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy Wednesday, the man who is on most pundits' presidential short list for 2016 said little that sounded substantively different from the Obama administration.

When he described it as increasingly important to ?speak to the American people? about world affairs because ?we no longer live in a national economy, we live in a global economy,? Rubio sounded like he could have been quoting John Kerry?s first speech earlier this month as secretary of State.

Rubio said he agreed with the president that negotiations with Iran must be given a chance, but that the Islamic Republic must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. He agreed that the US should not send weapons into a Syria ?already awash in arms.? And he said he supports the administration?s efforts to further the Palestinians? ?governance? expertise and economic development.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/VPvaB05A10Y/Marco-Rubio-sounds-a-lot-like-Obama-in-big-foreign-policy-speech

food network good friday f/a 18 f 18 crash virginia tenebrae the lake house petrino arkansas

Kenya's Equity Bank says profit rises 36 pct in 2012

* Raises per-share price to 10 rand from 8.55 rand * Plans to delist Cipla Medpro when sale complete MUMBAI (Reuters) - Indian drugmaker Cipla Ltd on Thursday sweetened its offer by 17 percent to take over South Africa's third-largest drugmaker, Cipla Medpro South Africa Ltd, ending the uncertainty of an earlier offer that had been put on hold by the Indian company. Cipla, India's fifth-largest drugmaker by sales, said it would spend about $512 million, or 10 rand a share, to acquire Cipla Medpro and then delist the South African drugmaker. ...

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/kenyas-equity-bank-says-profit-rises-36-pct-062337098--finance.html

notre dame notre dame football Bcs Bowl Chuck Hagel ncaa football CES russell wilson

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

New Infrared Tech Will Let Firemen See Through Flames

Firefighters will actually be able to see through flames thanks to infrared hologram technology, a new study in Italy has found. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/w3h80fS3IBc/new-infrared-tech-will-let-firemen-see-through-flames

mad cow pennsylvania primary jerome simpson hand sanitizer obama on jimmy fallon google drive pilar sanders

SpaceX tests rocket for space station launch

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket completed a two-second ignition of its first stage while being held down onto its Florida launch pad on Monday, in preparation for Friday's launch to the International Space Station. This view of the test was taken by a remote video camera, which makes it difficult to see the flare of the rocket.

By Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News

SpaceX said it completed a successful test of the engines on its Falcon 9 rocket on Monday, in preparation for Friday's planned cargo launch to the International Space Station.

The California-based rocket company's unmanned Dragon capsule is due to deliver about 1,200 pounds (550 kilograms) of supplies to the space station and bring back 2,300 pounds (1,050 kilograms) of cargo, including scientific samples and space station hardware.

Monday's static-fire test was aimed at checking the performance of the Falcon 9 first stage's nine engines before they're called upon to loft the second stage and the Dragon capsule toward orbit on Friday. The rocket was held down onto its launch pad at Space Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida for the engine firing, which came at the end of a dress rehearsal for Friday's countdown.


"SpaceX engineers ran through all countdown processes as though it were launch day," the company said in a statement issued after the 1:30 p.m. ET firing. "All nine engines fired at full power for two seconds, while the Falcon 9 was held down to the pad. SpaceX will now conduct a thorough review of all data and continue preparations for Friday's targeted launch."

In a Twitter update, SpaceX's billionaire founder, Elon Musk, reported that the static-fire test looked good: "Engines generated 433 tons of thrust, parameters nominal."

SpaceX said the first opportunity for launch will come at 10:10 a.m. ET on Friday. This is the third Dragon to be sent to the space station, and the second flight under the terms of a $1.6 billion, 12-flight cargo resupply contract with NASA.

Another company, Virginia-based Orbital Sciences Corp., has a separate $1.9 billion contract to deliver supplies to the space station but has not yet begun flying its Antares rocket and Cygnus cargo capsule. On Friday, Orbital completed a successful static-fire test of Antares' engines in preparation for the rocket's first flight, which is expected to take place later this year.

NASA's contracts with SpaceX and Orbital are meant to help fill the gap left by the retirement of the space shuttle fleet in 2011. Russian, European and Japanese unmanned spacecraft are also used to send supplies to the space station, but Russia's Soyuz capsule is the only spacecraft currently cleared to transport astronauts to and from orbit. NASA is providing more than $1 billion to SpaceX, the Boeing Co. and Sierra Nevada Corp. to support the development of new crew-capable spacecraft for low Earth orbit.

More about SpaceX's mission:


Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's?Facebook page, following?@b0yle on Twitter?and adding the?Cosmic Log page?to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out?"The Case for Pluto,"?my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Source: http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/25/17094139-spacex-falcon-9-rocket-passes-test-in-advance-of-space-station-launch?lite

phoebe snow jennifer hudson tribute to whitney houston nicki minaj grammy jason whitlock beach boys tony bennett joe walsh

Titanic replica plans to repeat ill-fated cruise: Second time's the charm?

A Titanic replica, complete with smokestacks (decorative) and lifeboats (improved), has already sold 40,000 tickets to re-attempt the 'unsinkable' ship's doomed cruise from England to New York.

By Eileen AJ Connelly,?Associated Press / February 26, 2013

The Titanic II cruises at sea in this artist's rendering provided by Blue Star Line. The ship, which Australian billionaire Clive Palmer is planning to build in China, is scheduled to sail in 2016.

Blue Star Line / AP

Enlarge

An Australian billionaire is getting ready to build a new version of the?Titanic?that could set sail in late 2016.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Clive Palmer unveiled blueprints for the famously doomed ship's namesake Tuesday at the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum in New York. He said construction is scheduled to start soon in China.

Palmer said 40,000 people have expressed interest in tickets for the maiden voyage, taking the original course from Southampton, England, to New York. He said people are inspired by his quest to replicate one of the most famous vessels in history.

"We all live on this planet, we all breathe the same air and, of course, the?Titanic?is about the things we've got in common," he said. "It links three continents."

The original?Titanic?was the world's largest and most luxurious ocean liner when it hit an iceberg in the North Atlantic and sank on April 15, 1912. Only 700 people of the more than 2,200 on board survived the most famous maritime disaster in history, partly because there were not enough lifeboats to carry everyone.

Palmer said an unknown when the original ship sailed ? climate change ? may play into a positive for the new ship's fate.

"One of the benefits of global warming is there hasn't been as many icebergs in the North Atlantic these days," Palmer said.

Passengers on board the replica will dress in the fashion of that period and eat dishes from the original menu, in dining rooms copied from the ill-fated predecessor.

Joining Palmer on Tuesday was Helen Benziger, the great granddaughter of?Titanic?survivor Margaret "Molly" Brown. Benziger, who agreed to serve on the advisory board for the?Titanic?II, said her great grandmother, who died in 1932, would have loved to see the?Titanic?rebuilt and complete the journey it never got to finish.

In what some may consider a temptation of fate for a remake of a notoriously "unsinkable" ship that sank, a representative of the Finnish designer of the?Titanic?II said it will be the "safest cruise ship in the world."

Markku Kanerva, director of sales for marine design company Deltamarin said that while the vessel is modeled after the legendary liner ? the diesel-powered ship will even have four decorative smoke stacks mimicking the coal-powered originals ? it will meet modern navigation and safety requirements.

In addition, plans call for a new "safety deck" featuring state-of-the-art lifeboats, safety chutes and slides. The new ship will also have amenities unknown a century ago, like air conditioning.

Palmer, who is funding construction of the ship himself, built his fortune in real estate and coal. Australia's BRW magazine estimated his net worth last year at $4 billion, although Forbes puts it at $895 million.

"I want to spend the money I've got before I die," he said. "You might as well spend it, not leave it to the kids to spend, there will be enough left for them anyway."

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/mm-Gpus_T_Q/Titanic-replica-plans-to-repeat-ill-fated-cruise-Second-time-s-the-charm

twisted metal sea lion si swimsuit 2012 westminster dog show abe lincoln vampire hunter xi jinping matt bomer

Here's How You Send Off the First Retiring Pope in 600 Years

No one is entirely sure what a final general audience for a retiring pope is supposed to be like. Somber? Solemn? That weird mix of happy and sad you get when its your favorite co-worker's last day? Since it's been almost 600 years since a living pope quit his job, those gathered in St. Peter's Square on Wednesday got to write their own rules on how to see off a retiring pope, and it actually looks like a lot of fun.?

RELATED: What's Next for the Catholic Church?

"With chants of "Benedetto!" erupting every so often, the mood ? even hours before Benedict was to arrive ? was far more buoyant than during the pope's final Sunday blessing," reported the AP.?The BBC's Jon Sopel was on the ground and had a similar experience:?

Fun and joyous atmosphere in St Peter's Square as pilgrims gather. Lots of chanting. Footballesque - tho no 'come on you Pope...'

? Jon Sopel (@BBCJonSopel) February 27, 2013

Imagine the chanting coming from this crowd:

RELATED: Five Best Monday Columns

Vatican officials had given out 50,000 tickets for the event, but authorities prepared for 200,000, reported The Telegraph.?Reuters says officials are estimating that around 150,000 people showed up.?We're terrible number estimators, so here's a wider shot of the crowd:

RELATED: Where the World's Catholics Are

Here's Pope Benedict XVI rolling out on his final ride in the Popemobile:

Children were kissed:

And like a college basketball game or mega concert, people made signs:?

Lots of them:?

And people wept...

In his final address to the crowd, Benedict acknowledged that his papacy had been punctuated with scandal?the ongoing fallout of the sex abuse cases, "Vatileaks," and controversy in the Vatican's bank. "The Lord gave us days of sun and of light breeze, days in which the fishing was good. There were also moments when there were stormy waters and headwinds."

Benedict added, "I will continue to accompany the Church with prayers and I ask you to pray for me and for the new?Pope." According to Reuters, the Vatican is aiming to elect a new pope by mid-March, so he will be able to preside over Holy Week masses and services (Easter Sunday is March 31). As for Benedict, he will leave Rome tomorrow afternoon at 5 p.m. local time, take a helicopter to Castel Gandolfo, make a small and final public appearance, and then at 8 p.m. the Swiss Guards "who stand as sentries at the residence will march off in a sign that the papacy is vacant," reports Reuters. Benedict is scheduled to move into a convent back in the Vatican in April.

Here's a video clip from the pope's final address:?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/heres-send-off-first-retiring-pope-600-years-123612384.html

sports illustrated westminster dog show 2012 words with friends words with friends phlebotomy dog show best in show

Saturday, February 2, 2013

New study sheds light on link between dairy intake and bone health: Not all dairy products are equal

Feb. 1, 2013 ? A study by researchers at the Institute for Aging Research (IFAR) at Hebrew SeniorLife, an affiliate of Harvard Medical School (HMS), has found that dairy intake -- specifically milk and yogurt -- is associated with higher bone mineral density (BMD) in the hip, but not the spine. Cream, on the other hand, may be associated with lower BMD overall. Published February 1 in the journal Archives of Osteoporosis, these findings suggest that not all dairy products are equally beneficial in promoting bone strength.

"Dairy foods provide several important nutrients that are beneficial for bone health," says lead author Shivani Sahni, Ph.D., Musculoskeletal Research Team, IFAR. "However, cream and its products such as ice cream have lower levels of these nutrients and have higher levels of fat and sugar. In this study, 2.5 -- 3 servings of milk and yogurt intake per day were associated with better bone density. More research is needed to examine the role of cheese intake (some of which can be high in fat and sodium), and whether individual dairy foods have a significant impact in reducing fractures."

IFAR researchers based their findings on data collected from a food frequency questionnaire completed by 3,212 participants from the Framingham Offspring study. They then compared participants' dairy intake with BMD measurement, which revealed the benefits of milk and yogurt versus cream in largely middle-aged men and women. According to the study, nutrient composition varies among dairy foods. Choosing low-fat milk or yogurt over cream can increase intake of protein, calcium and vitamin D while limiting intake of saturated fats.

This study is an example of a growing area of research focused on the relationship between nutrition and bone health. Past studies suggest that dairy products contain more than one beneficial nutrient, and for this reason certain dairy products may contribute towards maintaining healthier bones.

Research like this supports the idea that proper nutrition can help combat osteoporosis and fractures. Osteoporosis is considered a major public health threat for an estimated 44 million Americans, or half of those aged 50 and older.

? An estimated 10 million in the U.S. already have the disease. Women are at higher risk than men.

? Another 34 million Americans have low bone density, putting them at increased risk for osteoporosis and fractures, especially of the hip, spine and wrist. About one-quarter of those who suffer a hip fracture die within a year of the injury.

? Osteoporosis-related fractures were responsible for an estimated $19 billion in health care costs in 2005, with that figure expected to increase to $25 billion by 2025.

Co-authors on the study include, Katherine L. Tucker, Ph.D.; Douglas P. Kiel, M.D., M.P.H.; Lien Quach, M.P.H, M.S.; Virginia A. Casey, Ph.D.; Marian T. Hannan, D.Sc., M.P.H.

This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR # 053205 and also AR/AG41398) and by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study (N01-HC-25195), the Melvin First Young Investigator Award and General Mills Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Shivani Sahni, Katherine L. Tucker, Douglas P. Kiel, Lien Quach, Virginia A. Casey, Marian T. Hannan. Milk and yogurt consumption are linked with higher bone mineral density but not with hip fracture: the Framingham Offspring Study. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2013; 8 (1-2) DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0119-2

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/living_well/~3/dAJpGOcggcg/130201132336.htm

joan crawford joan crawford john goodman kendall marshall whitney houston news sylvia plath whitney houston

Friday, February 1, 2013

Jonathan Burton - Lines and Colors

Jonathan Burton
Jonathan Burton is a British illustrator now based in Bordeaux, France. His clients include Time, Nature, New Scientist, The Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Folio Society, Penguin Books, Orion Books and many others.

He was recently called on by The British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) to create the images for their annual awards evening this year (images above, top four) in which he interpreted several contemporary films.

Burton works very effectively with a muted palette and subtle value contrasts. His illustrations vary in style, but often evoke a feeling of previous centuries, and frequently seem to have a wry smile behind them.

[Via MetaFilter]

Source: http://www.linesandcolors.com/2013/01/31/jonathan-burton/

nfl mock draft 2012 norfolk island michael brockers lisa marie presley florida panthers tannehill joel ward

5 killed in separate attacks in north Nigeria

KADUNA, Nigeria (AP) ? Authorities say at least five police officers have been killed in separate attacks in northern Nigeria.

Gunmen raided Birnin-Gwari in Kaduna state late Wednesday, attacking a police station and using explosives to enter two banks in the area. Kaduna state police spokesman Aminu Lawan said Thursday that three police officers had been killed during the attack, which authorities believe was the work of a criminal gang.

In Gombe state in Nigeria's northeast, police say gunmen suspected to belong to a radical Islamist sect known as Boko Haram killed two officers at a checkpoint early Thursday morning.

The attacks come as Boko Haram launches attacks against Nigeria's weak central government. The bloodshed continues unstopped, despite the deployment of extra police officers and soldiers to the region.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/5-killed-separate-attacks-north-nigeria-152701807.html

direct tv wimbledon ray allen Savages Home Run Derby 2012 San Diego fireworks steve nash

Backfire ? An Argument That OA Is Better for Non-Profit Societies ...

English: A Coke pin

English: A Coke pin (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Recently, Stuart Shieber, Director of the Office for Scholarly Communication at Harvard published the edited text of a talk he gave at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, in which he praised open access (OA) as a better system for learned societies. This is an important topic, especially now because? Parliamentary hearings are going on in the UK exploring how RCUK mandates may affect learned societies.

Judging from the text, Shieber?s talk argued points his facts directly undercut, argued facts he didn?t understand, and asserted realities that don?t exist, yet he failed to realize any of this.

Shieber is a relentless advocate of OA publishing, and has been a force at Harvard driving their policies in this regard. In his recent post, Shieber argues that not-for-profit publishers are more efficient than commercial publishers because they command a lower price in the market for their goods, don?t engage nearly as much in bundling, and have smaller margins. This interpretation of the facts has four obvious problems:

  • Commercial publishers often publish on behalf of not-for-profit societies.
  • Commanding a higher price in the market is a sign of efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Having larger margins is a sign of efficiency.
  • Bundling is a sign of scale, which can only occur if there is efficiency.

In short, Shieber is looking through the wrong end of the binoculars. Of course, his main argument hinges on a related piece of equally spurious logic:

. . . the reason that scholarly societies benefit from playing in the open-access APC market rather than the closed-access subscription fee market is the difference in the goods being sold. When the good is a journal bundle, the companies with the biggest bundles, the large commercial publishers, win. When the good is publisher services for an individual article, the publishers that can deliver those services for an individual article most efficiently, the non-profit publishers, win. Sure, there are economies of scale, but empirical evidence shows that the scholarly societies are already far better able to efficiently deliver services despite any scale disadvantage.

As we?ll see, Shieber?s ?empirical evidence? is inadequate. He hasn?t parsed the market correctly. And the superior profitability and price advantages of publications going through a commercial publisher ? whether those publications are owned by a non-profit society or the commercial publisher ? make a mockery of this line of reasoning. In fact, OA will probably be done more efficiently by large commercial publishers ? viz, the acquisition of BioMed Central by Springer.

Basic business tenets also work against his argument. Every business has a core set of functions ? IT, legal, HR, finance, facilities, insurance, and so forth. If the organization is small, those functions take up a large proportion of revenues and staff. The organization is comparatively inefficient. Larger organizations can use systems, time zones, currency hedges, and many other techniques to increase efficiency, making the money they spend go farther. They also tend to have lower overheads ? less of their revenues devoted to supporting core functions.

The assertion that commercial publishers are less efficient than non-profit publishers is just wrong. Laughably wrong. Their margins are better, their market penetration is better, and their sales forces are better. That?s why so many non-profit societies sign contracts with commercial publishers. They want the benefits these organizations can and do deliver. And there is a reason these organizations can beat the status quo of running publications in-house ? they are more efficient and effective.

Of course, nothing can dissuade the true believer from the assertion that OA is superior. So, we get a litany of facts and reasoning. Let?s examine Shieber?s facts and reason a little more closely to see how much they have to be elided to fit the argument.

To start, Shieber uses the economic concept of a ?complement? incorrectly, asserting that two journals complement each other in the same way hot dogs and hot dog buns complement each other. That is, when hot dog sales fall, hot dog bun sales fall. That kind of relationship does not exist between journals. It exists between audiences and journals ? if there are no more druids, druidic journals disappear, for example. But Journal A?s usage doesn?t drive Journal?s B usage in any appreciable and direct way. His use of the term smacks of sophistry.

Cherry-picked facts come next. Shieber compares subscription prices between commercial and not-for-profit journals. The data he uses are a decade old, from 2002. Unfortunately, the comparison doesn?t represent reality in any year ? commercial publishers publish not-for-profit society journals. A potentially enlightening comparison would be to compare three different cohorts:

  1. Journals owned by for-profit publishers with no not-for-profit involved
  2. Society-owned journals published by commercial publishers
  3. Society-owned journals published independently

Despite using economic concepts incorrectly, having the wrong framework, and relying on outdated facts, Shieber argues on. His main observation is that price differentials are a clear sign of market failure. He?s right ? in a commodity-based market. His example is Coke vs. Pepsi. These are cola commodities. While it pains me to admit, I will settle for a Pepsi when Coke isn?t available. They are, to some degree, interchangeable. But in a market that has differentiated goods, prices diverge. Think about the difference in price between a Scion and a Lexus ? both made by the same company, both automobiles, but brand and features differentiate their prices significantly. Price divergence is not a sign of a malfunctioning market of differentiated, non-commodity goods. Think First Class vs. coach. Think Godiva vs. Nestl?. Think Nordstrom vs. Wal-Mart. Shieber?s economic analysis is simply wrong.

Sheiber?s thinking doesn?t even make internal sense. He notes that APCs vary greatly, ranging in his expert opinion from $0 to $3,000 (in reality, there are higher APCs on the market already). If OA is selling a commodity (peer-review, copy editing, and publication), how could prices diverge like this? And wasn?t he just claiming that price divergence is by definition a sign of a dysfunctional market? Therefore, is the OA market already broken?

He points to more out-of-date data to assert that most OA journals don?t charge APCs. It?s from a 2009 post of his examining 2007 data. The data set is no longer available via the link Shieber provides, but it?s probably irrelevant anyhow. Things have changed significantly. How much have things changed? Well, 2007 is when PLoS ONE launched. In 2008, BioMed Central was acquired by Springer. The NIH Public Access policy went into effect in 2008. And so forth. These data are from a different era.

Sheiber also brags about how Harvard was the first university to resist the ?Big Deal,? but then goes on to explain how disaggregating the Big Deal landed them back at the same place, but with less to show for it. That is, they ended up paying as much as they?d paid before, but for 30 journals rather than the 130 they?d had through bundling. This hurts two of his points. Apparently, bundling is an efficient way to sell and buy journals, proving that commercial publishers are more efficient in the market. Also, it?s apparent that the best journals in the bundle is what Harvard was paying for, but in the bundle they also received some strong second- and third-tier journals, many of which probably came from non-profit societies using Elsevier as their publisher. This is what bundles do ? they help send revenues across more titles, many of which come from small societies. Bundles help smaller societies. Therefore, bundling is a boon to non-profit societies using commercial publishers.

But, of course, Shieber?s goal is to convince us that OA is better for not-for-profit societies. To find a more current source of information, let?s look at an example that emerged from the Parliamentary hearings on the same day that Shieber?s post was published. In this example, we?re dealing with a UK non-profit society (the Tavistock Institute) that gleans $1,633,565 per year in revenues by publishing 60 articles per year in the journal Human Relations. Their publisher is SAGE, a commercial publisher. If the Tavistock Institute were to go to a complete OA model with attendant CC-BY licenses, the Institute would make $90,000 per year at Shieber?s proposed rate of $1,500 per article. In other words, their journal would lose $1,543,565 in revenues by shifting to OA. How does this help the Tavistock Institute?

This kind of trade-off isn?t uncommon, and it?s why societies are so concerned about unthinking mandates and policy shifts. You can see this example and many more in the public evidence available online for the UK?s Parliamentary proceedings.

Shieber throws accusations with abandon. Does the Big Deal violate anti-trust regulations? He points to a 2004 paper ? one single paper ? that suggested it may. What has happened in the last eight years? Based on my online searches, the answer is, ?Nothing.? There was one speculative paper, and then crickets. Shieber uses the empty rhetorical trick of playing organ music to evoke anxiety.

Finally, Shieber notes that 600 scholarly societies publish OA journals. However, when you begin clicking on links in the list he points to, a 404 error or being sent to a society home page is a very likely result. It seems many of these journals have gone by the boards ? journals that seem to be identified with the designation ?Transfer to publisher? or ?Transfer to society.? Others I looked at are publishing an article every week or two, hardly enough to sustain a robust journal?s infrastructure.

But back to the fundamental question: Is OA better for non-profit societies? Judging from what Shieber is inadvertently telling us, I?d be very concerned if I were running a not-for-profit learned society, especially in the UK. Not only are facts being twisted by OA advocates to suit a narrative, but once those facts are placed in a sensible tableau, the picture that emerges is one full of risk and penury.

Source: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/01/31/backfire-an-argument-that-oa-is-better-for-non-profit-societies-demonstrates-just-the-opposite/

seahawks new uniforms 2012 tornadoes in dallas anchorman 2 kentucky basketball oaksterdam the fray national anthem dallas tornado

Backyard chicken bans causing a stir in Southern California cities

Urban farmer John Lyons shows a few of the daily eggs he receives from his chickens in his Winnetka permaculture garden. (SGVN/Staff Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz)


Gallery: Urban farmer John Lyons raises chickens in his permaculture garden

Urbanites searching for cruelty-free eggs and farm-fresh produce are hatching plans to raise chickens and grow vegetables in their own backyards, redefining "local" food even beyond the neighborhood farmers market.

"Once you've eaten an egg that has come from a chicken in your backyard, you kind of turn your nose up at even the organic eggs in the store," said John Lyons, who owns the garden and chicken coop design company The Woven Garden.

But as the "urban homestead" movement continues to take flight in the Los Angeles region, many residents are clucking about some cities' bans on the egg-laying animals, which some see only as noisy neighbors.

When done right, backyard chickens can have many benefits, said Mike Scott of Eagle Rock, who builds chicken coops and vegetable gardens with his company Eagle Rock Backyard Farms. They can provide manure for the garden, eat household food waste, produce fresh eggs every morning and can even be lovable family pets.

"It's definitely a lifestyle, it's not just having another pet. You can have a dog and a dog gives you love back, but the chickens actually give you something for treating them really well, and that's the egg," Scott said. "You can't beat fresh eggs."

Chickens are already permitted in many cities, including Los Angeles, Pasadena, South Pasadena, Monterey Park, Glendora, Chino and Rancho Cucamonga, although many restrict the number of chickens per household and most ban roosters.

But San Dimas, Ontario, Montebello, San Gabriel and Whittier are among the cities that ban chickens in residential areas, and many who live in those cities are asking their city councils to lay off.

Last week, the San Marino City Council lifted its ban on backyard chickens at the request of some residents, though the city restricts the number of chickens per household and bans roosters.

San Gabriel is also looking to change its laws. The City Council last month granted resident Vito Clarizio a conditional permit to keep the eight chickens he's housed in his backyard for eight years, and directed staff to develop a new code that would allow backyard chickens with certain regulations.

Long Beach also has been considering loosening regulations on urban agriculture. A City Council committee considered the issue in June, and city staff are continuing to study how new proposed laws could be implemented.

The seemingly eccentric rule, a relic of Long Beach's

John Lyons raises egg-laying chickens in this Winnetka garden. He owns a company that builds organic gardens and chicken coops and teaches classes on gardening and raising chickens. (SGVN/Staff Photo by Sarah Reingewirtz)

20th century urbanization, was part of a pack of changes to the municipal code debated by the City Council's Environmental Committee recently.

The proposed law would allow up to four hens with no restriction, five to 10 chickens at least 25 feet away from a neighboring residence and 11 to 20 of the birds at least 50 feet away from homes.

Currently, up to 20 hens can be kept on a property if they are at least 50 feet away from single and two-family residences and 100 feet from homes of three families or more.

Lyons, who owns 20 chickens at his San Fernando Valley home, said city chicken bans are likely based on antiquated ordinances, and any city that has them should reconsider.

"The chicken ban makes absolutely no sense," Lyons said. "Chickens are very quiet creatures, I don't understand what the restriction is about."

And the growing voice of urban chicken owners may prompt many cities to, like San Marino and San Gabriel, take a second look at their municipal codes.

Jordanne Dervaes, of Urban Homestead in Pasadena, has made a business raising crops and chickens at her family home and helping others do the same. She said when she first started keeping chickens 10 years ago, it was hard to find any information on how to raise them in an urban environment.

"That was breaking new ground," Dervaes said. "It was very scary for me at the time."

Now, owning a chicken coop has become a way for people to eat healthy, natural food and know where it is coming from.

Dervaes said she's happy that urban farming has become more popular, but also is concerned that some chicken owners might not know what they're getting into.

It can be especially hard, she said, because many urban vets and humane societies won't provide chicken health services.

"Now it is a trend and as with every trend people don't adhere to basic things you need to do to take care of an animal," Dervaes said. "I've seen the good and the bad. It's good when people do it right, but if you don't do it right it could backlash for the rest of us who are doing it right."

Though there might not be a chicken vet in Los Angeles cities, websites like backyardchickens.com and urbanchickens.org, and groups like Los Angeles Urban Chicken Enthusiasts, can provide support for the urban farming community.

Rob Ludlow, owner of backyardchickens.com, said his site has more than 125,000 active members nationally, up from 50 when the site first started in 2007.

"There is a growing awareness of how fun and easy it is to raise backyard chickens," Ludlow said via email. "People are quickly realizing that chickens are a multi-purpose pet."

Ludlow, of Pleasant Hill-based Ludlow Concepts Inc., also co-authored "Raising Chickens for Dummies" and "Building Chicken Coops for Dummies."

Scott, who quit his corporate job two years ago to start his backyard farm business, said he has seen a similar boom in business since he started his company. He has built chicken coops, "edible gardens" and bee hives for residents throughout the region and most recently constructed one for the Los Angeles County Arboretum.

"It's basically sustainable living, and chicken coops are a big part of that," he said. "You're basically creating a mini ecosystem."

Ultimately, he said it's not just the environmental or health benefits that make owning chickens so great, it's the atmosphere and the relationship he has with his chickens that make him glad he chose the lifestyle.

"One of my favorite things to do is sit outside with a glass of wine and watch the chickens peck and look for bugs," Scott said. "It's really relaxing."

Chicken lovers

Cities that already permit chickens, with restrictions on the number:
Los Angeles, Pasadena, San Marino, South Pasadena, Monterey Park, Glendora, Chino and Rancho Cucamonga.

Chicken haters

Cities that ban chickens in residential areas:
San Dimas, Ontario, Montebello, San Gabriel and Whittier.
lauren.gold@sgvn.com
626-657-0990
twitter.com/laurenkgold

Source: http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_22477346/backyard-chicken-bans-causing-stir-southland-cities?source=rss_emailed

Olivia Black the voice World Ending 2012 gossip girl channing tatum Ink Master Jenni Rivera Funeral